Wiley L. Bolden v. City of Mobile, Alabama
This text of 626 F.2d 1324 (Wiley L. Bolden v. City of Mobile, Alabama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
626 F.2d 1324
Wiley L. BOLDEN et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 76-4210, 77-2042.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 15, 1980.
Charles B. Arendall, Jr., Mobile, Ala., Charles S. Rhyne, Washington, D. C., William S. Rhyne, Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellants.
J. U. Blacksher, Larry Menefee, Mobile, Ala., Edward Still, Birmingham, Ala., Jack Greenberg, Eric Schnapper, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellees.
Dennis J. Dimsey, Atty., Civil Rights Div., Appellate Sect., U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Miriam R. Eisenstein, Brian K. Landsberg, Walter W. Barnett, Attys., Drew S. Days, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Appellate Section, Civil Rights Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., amicus curiae for United States.
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before WISDOM, SIMPSON and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment heretofore entered by the District Court in this case is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama for further proceedings in light of the Supreme Court's opinion in City of Mobile, Ala. v. Bolden, ---- U.S. ----, 100 S.Ct. 1490, 64 L.Ed.2d 47 (1980).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
626 F.2d 1324, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 14105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiley-l-bolden-v-city-of-mobile-alabama-ca5-1980.