Wiles v. Medina Auto Parts

778 N.E.2d 1052, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1461
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wiles v. Medina Auto Parts. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 Ohio St. 3d 240
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 20, 2002·No. 2001-1303·Published

Opinion

Medina App. No. 3131-M. Reported at 96 Ohio St.3d 240, 2002-Ohio-3994, 773 N.E.2d 526. On motion for reconsideration of amici curiae Ohio Employment Lawyers Association, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers, et al. Motion denied.

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wiles v. Medina Auto Parts, 778 N.E.2d 1052, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1461 (Ohio 2002).

778 N.E.2d 1052 (Wiles v. Medina Auto Parts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wiles v. Medina Auto Parts
96 Ohio St. 3d 240 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
Wiles v. Medina Auto Parts
2002 Ohio 3994 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)