Wilensky v. Morrison
This text of 50 S.E. 472 (Wilensky v. Morrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where the consideration of a negotiable promissory note was certain services to be performed by the payee to the maker, failure of performance of the services was no defense to an action on the note brought by a purchaser thereof for value and before its maturity, though he knew of the consideration, but not of its failure, when he purchased. See Morrison v. Hart, ante, 660.
2. There was no complaint that any error of law was committed upon the trial. The evidence warranted the verdict and the court did not err in refusing a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 S.E. 472, 122 Ga. 664, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilensky-v-morrison-ga-1905.