Wilensky v. Hon

138 A.D.3d 430, 27 N.Y.S.3d 870
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 5, 2016
Docket309228/10 740 739
StatusPublished

This text of 138 A.D.3d 430 (Wilensky v. Hon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilensky v. Hon, 138 A.D.3d 430, 27 N.Y.S.3d 870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Jaffe, J.), entered November 28, 2012, which, inter alia, awarded plaintiff *431 mother primary physical and legal custody of the parties’ children, and order, same court (Matthew Cooper, J.), entered April 4, 2014, which scheduled a hearing on defendant father’s motion to modify custody, adhered to the schedule increasing defendant’s parenting time in an order entered on or about March 19, 2014, and denied plaintiff’s cross motion to vacate the March 19, 2014 order and to strike an expert report, unanimously affirmed to the extent a hearing was scheduled and the appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, as academic.

The motion court correctly scheduled a hearing on the father’s motion to modify custody based upon an initial showing of a change in circumstances (Matter of Patricia C. v Bruce L., 46 AD3d 399 [1st Dept 2007]). The remainder of these appeals have otherwise been rendered academic by an order of the same court (Matthew F. Cooper, J.), entered on or about December 22, 2014, which, after a hearing, awarded defendant permanent legal and physical custody of the children (see e.g. Matter of Brenda J. v Nicole M., 59 AD3d 299, 300 [1st Dept 2009]; Haggerty v Haggerty, 78 AD3d 998 [2d Dept 2010]; see also Matter of Victoria W., 305 AD2d 126 [1st Dept 2003]).

Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Richter, Gische and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patricia C. v. Bruce L.
46 A.D.3d 399 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Brenda J. v. Nicole M.
59 A.D.3d 299 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Haggerty v. Haggerty
78 A.D.3d 998 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re Victoria W.
305 A.D.2d 126 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 A.D.3d 430, 27 N.Y.S.3d 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilensky-v-hon-nyappdiv-2016.