Wile v. McGoldrick

286 A.D. 826, 141 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4224
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 21, 1955·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

There is no justification for disturbing the valuation of the property as now found by the State Rent Administrator since there was ample basis for such a finding. The administrator in determining what amount of rent would be required to afford the landlords a proper return has arrived at a figure which is well in excess of the 15% maximum increase allowable. That finding is sustained ' by the record. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. Concur — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Breitel and Rabin, JJ. [See post, p. 964.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wile v. McGoldrick, 286 A.D. 826, 141 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4224 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

286 A.D. 826 (Wile v. McGoldrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

I. L. F. Y. Co. v. Temporary State Housing Rent Commission
176 N.E.2d 822 (New York Court of Appeals, 1961)
Ackerman v. Weaver
160 N.E.2d 520 (New York Court of Appeals, 1959)