Wildwood Estates of Braintree, Inc. v. Smith

322 N.E.2d 781, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 705
CourtMassachusetts Appeals Court
DecidedFebruary 3, 1975
StatusPublished

This text of 322 N.E.2d 781 (Wildwood Estates of Braintree, Inc. v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wildwood Estates of Braintree, Inc. v. Smith, 322 N.E.2d 781, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 705 (Mass. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

Neither of the exceptions claimed by the respondents appears to have been intended (nor was either sufficient) to cast doubt on the validity of the judge’s finding, which is dispositive of the respondents’ claim (s) of “prescriptive rights” or of “rights of prescription,” that “they [the respondents] have not used the pond uninterruptedly for over twenty years.” See G. L. c. 187, § 2. No question of “dedication of rights to the general public” was raised by or open under the pleadings.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 2
Massachusetts § 2

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
322 N.E.2d 781, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wildwood-estates-of-braintree-inc-v-smith-massappct-1975.