Wildwood Estates of Braintree, Inc. v. Smith
This text of 322 N.E.2d 781 (Wildwood Estates of Braintree, Inc. v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Neither of the exceptions claimed by the respondents appears to have been intended (nor was either sufficient) to cast doubt on the validity of the judge’s finding, which is dispositive of the respondents’ claim (s) of “prescriptive rights” or of “rights of prescription,” that “they [the respondents] have not used the pond uninterruptedly for over twenty years.” See G. L. c. 187, § 2. No question of “dedication of rights to the general public” was raised by or open under the pleadings.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
322 N.E.2d 781, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wildwood-estates-of-braintree-inc-v-smith-massappct-1975.