Wilds v. Wilds
This text of 399 So. 2d 1038 (Wilds v. Wilds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Howard F. WILDS, Jr., Appellant,
v.
Virginia H. WILDS, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jepeway & Jepeway and Louis M. Jepeway, Jr., Miami, for appellant.
A.M. Schwitalla, Coral Gables, and James A. White, Miami, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL and DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
It is not necessary that one spouse be completely unable to pay attorney's fees in order to require the other spouse to pay the fees. An award of attorney's fees may be proper to avoid an inequitable diminution of other fiscal sums granted to the wife. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980). The record brought forward by the appellant is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
399 So. 2d 1038, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilds-v-wilds-fladistctapp-1981.