Wildrew Theatre Corp. v. Kent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wildrew Theatre Corp. v. Kent

51 A.D.2d 813, 380 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11406

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 23, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 813 (Wildrew Theatre Corp. v. Kent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wildrew Theatre Corp. v. Kent, 51 A.D.2d 813, 380 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11406 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action inter alia to declare that a certain lease is valid and subsisting, defendants David Kent and 711 Kings Highway Corporation appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 2, 1975, which denied their separate motions (1) to dismiss the action as against them for lack of personal jurisdiction and (2) for a protective order, and ordered their appearance at an examination before trial. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The examination of appellants shall proceed at a time and place to be fixed in a written notice of not less than 10 days, to be given by plaintiff, or at such time and place [814]*814as the parties may agree. Special Term properly determined that appellants failed to complete their traverse in a timely fashion. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action inter alia to declare that a certain lease is valid and subsisting, defendants David Kent and 711 Kings Highway Corporation appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 2, 1975, which denied their separate motions (1) to dismiss the action as against them for lack of personal jurisdiction and (2) for a protective order, and ordered their appearance at an examination before trial. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The examination of appellants shall proceed at a time and place to be fixed in a written notice of not less than 10 days, to be given by plaintiff, or at such time and place [814]*814as the parties may agree. Special Term properly determined that appellants failed to complete their traverse in a timely fashion. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 813, 380 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wildrew-theatre-corp-v-kent-nyappdiv-1976.