Wildey v. Wilson
This text of 147 N.Y.S. 540 (Wildey v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
While this form of a denial “to the allegations contained in the first paragraph of the complaint,” there being several allegations of fact, is not good pleading (Kirschbaum v. Eschmann, 205 N. Y. 127, 131, 98 N. E. 328), yet under the requirement of section 170 of the Municipal Court Act, requiring the-allegations of a pleading to be liberally construed, I am of the opinion that we should not apply the rule strictly to this answer, where none of the allegations thus denied are presumptively within the knowledge of the defendant.
.
information and belief that the defendant denies each and every allegation in the second and third paragraphs of the complaint herein”— is inartistic, it is sufficient to,raise an issue; the verification having been made by the attorney. Jones v. Ludlum, 74 N. Y. 61; Kirschbaum v. Eschmann, supra, 205 N. Y. 130, 98 N. E. 328.
Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordéred, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
147 N.Y.S. 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wildey-v-wilson-nyappterm-1914.