Wilderness Soc. v. US Forest Service
This text of 630 F.3d 1173 (Wilderness Soc. v. US Forest Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The WILDERNESS SOCIETY; Prairie Falcon Audubon, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; Jane P. Kollmeyer; Scott C. Nannenga, Defendants-Appellees, and
Magic Valley Trail Machine Association; Idaho Recreation Council; Blueribbon Coalition, Inc., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
David A. Bahr, Eugene, OR, Megan Mccrea Anderson O'Reilly, Erik Schlenker-Goodrich, Taos, NM, Scott W. Reed, Coeur D'Alene, ID, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Katherine Wade Hazard, Jason A. Hill, Beverly F. Li, Trial, DOJU.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees.
Paul A. Turcke, Moore Smith Buxton & Turcke Chartered, Boise, ID, for Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants.
*912 ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be heard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
630 F.3d 1173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilderness-soc-v-us-forest-service-ca9-2010.