Wildermuth v. Keating
277 A.D.2d 1139
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 11, 1950
StatusPublished
This text of 277 A.D.2d 1139 (Wildermuth v. Keating) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wildermuth v. Keating, 277 A.D.2d 1139 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for libel, order granting respondent’s motion to dismiss appellant’s supplemental complaint, pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Holán, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur. [See 278 App. Div. 571.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 1139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wildermuth-v-keating-nyappdiv-1950.