Wilderman v. Cooper & Scully PC
Opinion
Opinions of the United
2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
10-28-2005
Wilderman v. Cooper & Scully PC Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential
Docket No. 04-1876
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005
Recommended Citation "Wilderman v. Cooper & Scully PC" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 286. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/286
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 04-1876
BRUCE J. WILDERMAN, D.D.S.;
HEIDY D. WILDERMAN,
Appellants
v.
COOPER & SCULLY, P.C.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 04-cv-00460)
District Judge: Honorable Stewart Dalzell
Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
September 30, 2005
Before: ALITO, and AMBRO, Circuit Judges RESTANI,* Chief Judge
ORDER
After further review, the Opinion issued on October 13, 2005 is amended and has been determined to be precedential.
By the Court,
/s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge
Dated: October 28, 2005 CMH/cc: RMGm REM, SJP, GWB, KK, GW
* Honorable Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilderman v. Cooper & Scully PC (Wilderman v. Cooper & Scully PC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.