Wilder v. Wilmington North Carolina Police Department

Fourth Circuit

Wilder v. Wilmington North Carolina Police Department

655 F. App'x 175

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2016·No. No. 16-1255·Published

Opinion

[176] Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding prepedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilder v. Wilmington N.C. Police Dep’t, No. 7:09-cv-00036-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[176] Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding prepedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilder v. Wilmington N.C. Police Dep’t, No. 7:09-cv-00036-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Wilder v. Wilmington North Carolina Police Department, 655 F. App'x 175 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

655 F. App'x 175 (Wilder v. Wilmington North Carolina Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.