Wilder v. Wilmington North Carolina Police Department
This text of 655 F. App'x 175 (Wilder v. Wilmington North Carolina Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[176]*176Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding prepedent in this circuit.
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilder v. Wilmington N.C. Police Dep’t, No. 7:09-cv-00036-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
655 F. App'x 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilder-v-wilmington-north-carolina-police-department-ca4-2016.