Wilder v. Whittemore
This text of 15 Mass. 261 (Wilder v. Whittemore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is clear that the plea in bar does not show a performance of the condition of the deed; for it is nowhere stipulated therein that the mortgagees shall be obliged to receive their support in the house of the mortgagor, or of any of his assignees On the contrary, wherever they choose to live, they have a right to [243]*243be supported, according to this contract, so that they do not create needless expense to the mortgagor, or those holding under him.
The demandant has a right, therefore, to the possession of * the estate, unless the mortgagor will pray for the conditional judgment; in which case, an estimate may be made of the time during which she has been left without support, and judgment nisi, &c., may then be entered,
Vide Jackson vs. Florence, 16 Johns, 47.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 Mass. 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilder-v-whittemore-mass-1818.