Wilder v. Whittemore

15 Mass. 261
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 15, 1818·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

It is clear that the plea in bar does not show a performance of the condition of the deed; for it is nowhere stipulated therein that the mortgagees shall be obliged to receive their support in the house of the mortgagor, or of any of his assignees On the contrary, wherever they choose to live, they have a right to [243]*243be supported, according to this contract, so that they do not create needless expense to the mortgagor, or those holding under him.

The demandant has a right, therefore, to the possession of * the estate, unless the mortgagor will pray for the conditional judgment; in which case, an estimate may be made of the time during which she has been left without support, and judgment nisi, &c., may then be entered,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilder v. Whittemore, 15 Mass. 261 (Mass. 1818).

15 Mass. 261 (Wilder v. Whittemore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jancovech v. Christensen, Gdn.
195 N.E. 287 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1935)
Inhabitants of Clinton v. Inhabitants of Benton
49 Me. 550 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1862)
Harris v. Cannon
6 Ga. 382 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1849)