Wilder v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Wilder v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.

667 F. App'x 399

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2016·No. No. 16-1267·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Aikens v. Ingram, 652 F.3d 496, 501 (4th Cir. 2011) (providing standard). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm. Wilder’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Aikens v. Ingram, 652 F.3d 496, 501 (4th Cir. 2011) (providing standard). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm. Wilder’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Wilder v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp., 667 F. App'x 399 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

667 F. App'x 399 (Wilder v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related