Wilder v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Wilder v. State

126 S.E. 21, 33 Ga. App. 148, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 783

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 9, 1924

Docket15928

StatusPublished

This text of 126 S.E. 21 (Wilder v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilder v. State, 126 S.E. 21, 33 Ga. App. 148, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 783 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence authorized the defendant’s conviction of violating the prohibition statute. The assignments of error upon excerpts from the charge of the court, when the charge is read in its entirety, are without merit. The special assignments of error upon the rulings of the court upon the admissibility of evidence are without merit. Dor no reason pointed out did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, 0. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The evidence authorized the defendant’s conviction of violating the prohibition statute. The assignments of error upon excerpts from the charge of the court, when the charge is read in its entirety, are without merit. The special assignments of error upon the rulings of the court upon the admissibility of evidence are without merit. Dor no reason pointed out did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, 0. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 S.E. 21, 33 Ga. App. 148, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilder-v-state-gactapp-1924.