Wilder v. State

675 So. 2d 1041, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6924, 1996 WL 366276
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 3, 1996
DocketNo. 96-1104
StatusPublished

This text of 675 So. 2d 1041 (Wilder v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilder v. State, 675 So. 2d 1041, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6924, 1996 WL 366276 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Larry Wilder appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his post-conviction relief motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Although the order cites portions of the record to support its denial, the trial court failed to append those portions of the record to its order, as required by Rule 3.850(d). Accordingly, this case is reversed and remanded with directions to the trial court to either conduct an evidentiary hearing or append to its order those portions of the record that show Wilder is not entitled to [1042]*1042relief. See Carter v. State, 632 So.2d 1139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Lewis v. State, 613 So.2d 115 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER, C.J., and POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lewis v. State
613 So. 2d 115 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Carter v. State
632 So. 2d 1139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
675 So. 2d 1041, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6924, 1996 WL 366276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilder-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.