Wilder v. Shalala
This text of Wilder v. Shalala (Wilder v. Shalala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1405
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DONNA E. SHALALA, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:97-cv-02616-WDQ)
Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 24, 2009
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district
court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm. Wilder's request for rehearing and motion for
appointment of counsel are denied. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wilder v. Shalala, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilder-v-shalala-ca4-2009.