Wilder v. House

Illinois Supreme Court

Wilder v. House

40 Ill. 92

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedApril 15, 1867

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 40 Ill. 92 (Wilder v. House) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilder v. House, 40 Ill. 92 (Ill. 1867).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

This bill of exceptions appears to have been properly signed by the judge at the term at which the cause was tried, and filed within the time allowed for that purpose. We cannot, therefore, alter the record upon affidavits. If there is any irregularity in the making or filing of the hill of exceptions, application should be made, upon notice to the opposite party, to the court below to correct the record. The record, as certified to this court, imports verity; and we will not undertake to reform it; that belongs alone to the court where the record was made and the cause was tried.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

This bill of exceptions appears to have been properly signed by the judge at the term at which the cause was tried, and filed within the time allowed for that purpose. We cannot, therefore, alter the record upon affidavits. If there is any irregularity in the making or filing of the hill of exceptions, application should be made, upon notice to the opposite party, to the court below to correct the record. The record, as certified to this court, imports verity; and we will not undertake to reform it; that belongs alone to the court where the record was made and the cause was tried.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 Ill. 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilder-v-house-ill-1867.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack