Wilder v. Gage
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1117
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN GAGE, President, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 1923; JOE FLYNN, Vice President, AFGE Local 1923, AFL-CIO; ANN ROBINSON, Vice President, AFGE 1923 Local, AFL-CIO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:97-cv-02354-FNS)
Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 25, 2008
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Francis Joseph Collins, KAHN, SMITH & COLLINS, PA, Baltimore, Maryland; Mark D. Roth, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, Washington, DC, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district
court’s orders denying his motion to reopen a civil action and
denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Wilder v. Gage, No.
1:97-cv-02354-FNS (D. Md. Dec. 5, 2007; Dec. 17, 2007). Wilder’s
motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilder v. Gage (Wilder v. Gage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.