Wilder v. Federal Court

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 JACK RYAN WILDER, 9 Plaintiff, Case No. C25-1481-KKE 10 v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 11 FEDERAL COURT, 12 Defendant. 13

14 Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in the above-entitled 15 action. (Dkt. # 1.) In the IFP application, Plaintiff disclosed a net monthly salary of $932.00 per 16 month, $907.00 from public assistance, $0.99 in his checking account, no savings, no cash on 17 hand, no valuable property, no dependents, and no monthly expenses. (Id. at 1-2.) 18 On August 20, 2025, this Court issued an Order to Show Cause. (Dkt. # 4.) This Court 19 explained that it could not determine Plaintiff’s ability to pay court fees and costs because he 20 failed to list his expenses for basic necessities or explain why he could not afford court fees. (Id. 21 at 2.) Plaintiff was ordered to show cause by August 27, 2025, why this Court should not 22 recommend that his IFP application be denied, or to submit an amended IFP application 23 providing the required information. (Id.) 1 Additionally, on August 6, 2025, the Clerk of Court notified Plaintiff that his submission 2 was deficient due to the lack of a civil cover sheet. (Dkt. # 3 (citing Local Rules W.D. Wash. 3 LCR 3(a)).) Plaintiff was instructed to provide a civil cover sheet “as soon as possible” and 4 warned that failure to do so could affect the status of the case, including potential dismissal. (Id.)

5 To date, Plaintiff has not complied with this instruction 6 A district court may permit indigent litigants to proceed IFP upon completion of a proper 7 affidavit of indigence. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). “To qualify for in forma pauperis status, a civil 8 litigant must demonstrate both that the litigant is unable to pay court fees and that the claims he 9 or she seeks to pursue are not frivolous.” Ogunsalu v. Nair, 117 F. App’x 522, 523 (9th Cir. 10 2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1051 (2005). To meet the first prong of this test, a litigant must 11 show that he or she “cannot because of his [or her] poverty pay or give security for the costs and 12 still be able to provide him[ or her]self and dependents with the necessities of life.” Adkins v. E.I. 13 DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948) (internal alterations omitted). 14 Plaintiff has failed to correct the deficiencies in his IFP application, as identified in this

15 Court’s Order to Show Cause (dkt. # 4) and explained above.1 After careful consideration of 16 Plaintiff’s IFP application, the governing law, and the balance of the record, this Court 17 RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff’s IFP application (dkt. # 1) be DENIED and that Plaintiff be 18 directed to pay the filing fee within thirty (30) days after entry of the Court’s Order adopting 19 this Report and Recommendation. If no filing fee is paid within thirty days of the Court’s Order, 20 the Clerk of Court should close the case. A proposed order accompanies this Report and 21 Recommendation. 22 1 To the extent Plaintiff fears public disclosure of his private information, the Court directs Plaintiff to 23 Local Court Rule (“LCR”) 5(g), which outlines the circumstances and procedures for filing documents under seal. See LCR 5(g) (available at https://www.wawd.uscourts.gov/local-rules-and-orders (last accessed June 17, 2025)). 1 Objections to this Report and Recommendation, if any, should be filed with the Clerk and 2 served upon all parties to this suit not later than fourteen (14) days from the date on which this 3 Report and Recommendation is signed. Failure to file objections within the specified time may 4 affect your right to appeal. Objections should be noted for consideration on the District Judge’s

5 motions calendar fourteen (14) days from the date they are filed. Responses to objections may 6 be filed by the day before the noting date. If no timely objections are filed, the matter will be 7 ready for consideration by the District Judge on September 19, 2025. 8 The Clerk is directed to send copies of this order to the parties and to the Honorable 9 Kymberly K. Evanson. 10 Dated this 4th day of September, 2025. 11 12 A 13 MICHELLE L. PETERSON United States Magistrate Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23