Wilder v. Ewbank
21 Wend. 587
This text of 21 Wend. 587 (Wilder v. Ewbank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wilder v. Ewbank, 21 Wend. 587 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1839).
Opinion
By the Court,
This case falls within the principle of Jackson v. Sheldon, 5 Cowen, 448. I had prepared an opinion assigning the reasons why I think that case ought not to be followed. But my brethren are of opinion that we ought not to depart from the former case, and that the decision of the justice was consequently erroneous.
Proceedings reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ramapo Manufacturing Co. v. Mapes
110 N.E. 772 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)
Illinois Steel Co. v. Budzisz
119 N.W. 935 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1909)
Virginia Midland Railroad v. Barbour & Jeffries
33 S.E. 554 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1899)
Camp v. Scott
47 Conn. 366 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1879)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
21 Wend. 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilder-v-ewbank-nysupct-1839.