Wilder v. Ewbank
21 Wend. 587
Opinion
By the Court,
This case falls within the principle of Jackson v. Sheldon, 5 Cowen, 448. I had prepared an opinion assigning the reasons why I think that case ought not to be followed. But my brethren are of opinion that we ought not to depart from the former case, and that the decision of the justice was consequently erroneous.
Proceedings reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilder v. Ewbank, 21 Wend. 587 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1839).
21 Wend. 587 (Wilder v. Ewbank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ramapo Manufacturing Co. v. Mapes
110 N.E. 772 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)
Illinois Steel Co. v. Budzisz
119 N.W. 935 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1909)
Virginia Midland Railroad v. Barbour & Jeffries
33 S.E. 554 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1899)
Camp v. Scott
47 Conn. 366 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1879)