Wilder v. Clark
This text of 11 N.Y.S. 683 (Wilder v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The fund never belonged to Mr. Clark. It was created by the energy of certain officials of the Press Club for his relief and benefit as a fellow-member. It is in the nature of a charity, and the creators of it have the right to impress upon its disposition any reasonable safeguard not inconsistent with its object. These officials have decided that $30 per week is a reasonable allowance for the purpose of relieving Clark’s necessities. The amount so fixed seems fair under the circumstances. The fund so created cannot be assigned nor reached by judgment creditors. It was not created as a subject of barter, nor as a fund for creditors. Motion to compel payment over of fund to judgment creditors or assignee denied. Ho costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 N.Y.S. 683, 33 N.Y. St. Rep. 143, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilder-v-clark-nynyccityct-1890.