Wilder v. Catoe

Fourth Circuit

Wilder v. Catoe

33 F. App'x 142

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 30, 2002·No. No. 02-6397·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Samuel A. Wilder seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Wilder v. Catoe, No. CA-00-3257 (D.S.C. Feb. 8, 2002). We further deny Wilder’s motion for a preliminary injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Samuel A. Wilder seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Wilder v. Catoe, No. CA-00-3257 (D.S.C. Feb. 8, 2002). We further deny Wilder’s motion for a preliminary injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Wilder v. Catoe, 33 F. App'x 142 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

33 F. App'x 142 (Wilder v. Catoe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related