Wilder v. Brooks

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 26, 2009
• Docket: 09-6381
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6381

SAMUEL ANTHONY WILDER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHARLES T. BROOKS, III; JUDGE MARKLEY R. DENNIS, JR.; DONALD J. ZELENKA; LONETTA B. BRAWLEY, all in their individual capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (3:08-cv-03089-MBS)

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Anthony Wilder, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Samuel Anthony Wilder appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge,

denying his motion for a preliminary injunction, and dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)

(2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal

is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the

reasons stated by the district court. Wilder v. Brooks, No.

3:08-cv-03089-MBS (D.S.C. Feb. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED