Wilder v. Astrue

325 F. App'x 231
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 26, 2009
DocketNo. 08-2358
StatusPublished

This text of 325 F. App'x 231 (Wilder v. Astrue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilder v. Astrue, 325 F. App'x 231 (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Carlos Milton Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice for failure to comply with the district court’s local rule that requires pro se litigants to keep a current address on file. On appeal, Wilder has failed to raise any arguments relevant to the district court’s reasoning for dismissing the action. Thus, those claims have been abandoned. Edwards v. City of Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 241 n. 6 (4th Cir.1999); see 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edwards v. City of Goldsboro
178 F.3d 231 (Fourth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
325 F. App'x 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilder-v-astrue-ca4-2009.