Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Elder

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Elder

100 S.E. 652, 24 Ga. App. 265, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 541

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 10, 1919

Docket10630

StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.E. 652 (Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Elder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Elder, 100 S.E. 652, 24 Ga. App. 265, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 541 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

A trial by jury was waived, and this case was submitted to one of the judges of the municipal court of Atlanta, and he passed upon the case without the intervention of a jury. There is a sharp [266]*266conflict in the evidence. The judge who tried the case saw and heard the witnesses. The judge of the superior court overruled the petition for certiorari, thus approving the finding of the judge of the municipal court. We cannot say that the judge of the superior court erred in his ruling, and the judgment is

Decided October 10, 1919.

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court—Judge Bell. April 10, 1919.

Little, Powell, Smith <& Goldstein, for plaintiff in error. George Westmoreland, Bell & Bilis, contra.

Affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

A trial by jury was waived, and this case was submitted to one of the judges of the municipal court of Atlanta, and he passed upon the case without the intervention of a jury. There is a sharp [266]*266conflict in the evidence. The judge who tried the case saw and heard the witnesses. The judge of the superior court overruled the petition for certiorari, thus approving the finding of the judge of the municipal court. We cannot say that the judge of the superior court erred in his ruling, and the judgment is

Decided October 10, 1919.

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court—Judge Bell. April 10, 1919.

Little, Powell, Smith <& Goldstein, for plaintiff in error. George Westmoreland, Bell & Bilis, contra.

Affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 S.E. 652, 24 Ga. App. 265, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilder-manufacturing-co-v-elder-gactapp-1919.