Wildenhaim v. Knight

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Wildenhaim v. Knight

11 R.I. Dec. 6

Superior Court of Rhode Island·Decided January 27, 1934·No. No. 2800·Published

Opinion

FROST, J.

Heard on defendant’s motion for new trial after verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $44.

This case was tried with the case of Hazel Wildenhaim and that of Barbara Wildenhaim, p. a., against the same defendant. (See rescript in the latter case.)

The sum awarded is the amount of the bill for medical services rendered plaintiff’s daughter, Barbara.

It is not improbable that a portion of the -bill was incurred in preparation for trial but as that does not definitely and clearly -appear, the Court will not reduce the amount awarded.

Defendant’s motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FROST, J.

Heard on defendant’s motion for new trial after verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $44.

This case was tried with the case of Hazel Wildenhaim and that of Barbara Wildenhaim, p. a., against the same defendant. (See rescript in the latter case.)

The sum awarded is the amount of the bill for medical services rendered plaintiff’s daughter, Barbara.

It is not improbable that a portion of the -bill was incurred in preparation for trial but as that does not definitely and clearly -appear, the Court will not reduce the amount awarded.

Defendant’s motion is denied.

Wildenhaim v. Knight, 11 R.I. Dec. 6 (R.I. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

11 R.I. Dec. 6 (Wildenhaim v. Knight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.