Wilde v. Dunn
11 Johns. 459
This text of 11 Johns. 459 (Wilde v. Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wilde v. Dunn, 11 Johns. 459 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1814).
Opinion
There is ground to presume that the defendant below had no bona fide intention of defending the suit; and the delay after she appeared was not, under all circumstances, so unreasonable as to work a discontinuance : besides, her attorney was present during the trial. The judgment ought to be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 Johns. 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilde-v-dunn-nysupct-1814.