Wilde v. . Dowse

Court of King's Bench

Wilde v. . Dowse

1 N.C. 747

DecidedJuly 5, 1793

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 747 (Wilde v. . Dowse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of King's Bench primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilde v. . Dowse, 1 N.C. 747 (kingsbench 1793).

Pincite

Opinion

1. It was adjudged that the general parlance, that he had not found sufficient pledges, was well enough, being in the negative.

2. That to say that he paid him vada usualia, without showing what those fees were, is well. Aliter on an action brought to demand the fees.

3. That this was a receipt, on which an action upon the case lies against A., although he be not a regular officer, but an officer pro hacvice, for this purpose.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1. It was adjudged that the general parlance, that he had not found sufficient pledges, was well enough, being in the negative.

2. That to say that he paid him vada usualia, without showing what those fees were, is well. Aliter on an action brought to demand the fees.

3. That this was a receipt, on which an action upon the case lies against A., although he be not a regular officer, but an officer pro hacvice, for this purpose.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilde-v-dowse-kingsbench-1793.