Wilde v. Berryhill

• Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
• Decided: September 23, 2020
• Docket: 5:19-cv-11401
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Annette L. Wilde,

Plaintiff, Case No. 19-11401

v. Judith E. Levy United States District Judge Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Mag. Judge Anthony P. Patti

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [22]

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti’s Report and Recommendation recommending the Court deny Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 17) and grant Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 19). (ECF No. 22.) The parties were required to file specific written objections within 14 days of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. L.R. 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The Court has nevertheless carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and concurs in the reasoning and result. Accordingly, The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 22) is ADOPTED; Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 17) is DENIED; Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 19) is

GRANTED; and The findings of the Commissioner are ADOPTED and this case is

hereby DISMISSED.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 23, 2020 s/Judith E. Levy Ann Arbor, Michigan JUDITH E. LEVY United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on September 23, 2020. s/William Barkholz WILLIAM BARKHOLZ Case Manager

1 By failing to object to the Report and Recommendation, the parties have waived any further right of appeal. United States v. Archibald, 589 F.3d 289, 295–96 (6th Cir. 2009).