Wilday v. Panas
3 A.2d 619, 122 N.J.L. 28, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 298
This text of 3 A.2d 619 (Wilday v. Panas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wilday v. Panas, 3 A.2d 619, 122 N.J.L. 28, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 298 (N.J. 1939).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion delivered per curiam by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, PIeteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
PH. Chaleyer, Inc. v. Simon
91 F. Supp. 5 (D. New Jersey, 1950)
Campanelli v. Vescera
63 A.2d 722 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1949)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 A.2d 619, 122 N.J.L. 28, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilday-v-panas-nj-1939.