WILDA JOSEPH v. ERNEST JEANTY

District Court of Appeal of Florida

WILDA JOSEPH v. ERNEST JEANTY

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 18, 2019

Docket19-1229

StatusPublished

This text of WILDA JOSEPH v. ERNEST JEANTY (WILDA JOSEPH v. ERNEST JEANTY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

WILDA JOSEPH v. ERNEST JEANTY, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

WILDA KELLEY JOSEPH, Appellant,

v.

ERNEST E. JEANTY, JR., and STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellees.

No. 4D19-1229

[September 18, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael I. Rothschild, Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE 18- 001191 (44).

Wilda Joseph, Hollywood, pro se.

No appearance for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979). As to appellant’s argument that the court erred in denying her motion to continue the trial, the court did not abuse its discretion in denying a continuance based upon the reason set forth in the motion.

WARNER, GROSS and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI