Wild v. Wild
This text of Wild v. Wild (Wild v. Wild) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
HENRY E. WILD, III,1 § § Respondent Below, § No. 205, 2020 Appellant, § § Court Below: Family Court v. § of the State of Delaware § TONI L. WILD, § File No. CK19-01732 § Petition No. 19-12050 Petitioner Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: October 6, 2020 Decided: October 15, 2020
ORDER
On September 16, 2020, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice, sent by
certified mail, directing the appellant to show cause why his appeal should not be
dismissed for his failure to file his opening brief and appendix. On September 23,
2020, the Court received the certified mail receipt indicating that the notice to show
cause had been delivered. A timely response to the notice to show cause would have
been due on or before October 5, 2020. The appellant has not responded to the notice
to show cause, nor has he filed an opening brief. Dismissal of the appeal is therefore
deemed to be unopposed.
1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 7(d). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)
and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr. Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wild v. Wild, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wild-v-wild-del-2020.