Wild v. Wild

CourtSupreme Court of Delaware
DecidedOctober 15, 2020
Docket205, 2020
StatusPublished

This text of Wild v. Wild (Wild v. Wild) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wild v. Wild, (Del. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

HENRY E. WILD, III,1 § § Respondent Below, § No. 205, 2020 Appellant, § § Court Below: Family Court v. § of the State of Delaware § TONI L. WILD, § File No. CK19-01732 § Petition No. 19-12050 Petitioner Below, § Appellee. §

Submitted: October 6, 2020 Decided: October 15, 2020

ORDER

On September 16, 2020, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice, sent by

certified mail, directing the appellant to show cause why his appeal should not be

dismissed for his failure to file his opening brief and appendix. On September 23,

2020, the Court received the certified mail receipt indicating that the notice to show

cause had been delivered. A timely response to the notice to show cause would have

been due on or before October 5, 2020. The appellant has not responded to the notice

to show cause, nor has he filed an opening brief. Dismissal of the appeal is therefore

deemed to be unopposed.

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 7(d). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)

and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr. Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wild v. Wild, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wild-v-wild-del-2020.