Wild v. Temple Isaiah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wild v. Temple Isaiah

72 A.D.3d 809, 898 N.Y.S.2d 479

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 13, 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 72 A.D.3d 809 (Wild v. Temple Isaiah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wild v. Temple Isaiah, 72 A.D.3d 809, 898 N.Y.S.2d 479 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), entered April 13, 2009, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

[810]*810Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant established, prima facie, its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), entered April 13, 2009, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

[810]*810Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant established, prima facie, its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 A.D.3d 809, 898 N.Y.S.2d 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wild-v-temple-isaiah-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack