Wild v. Temple Isaiah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wild v. Temple Isaiah

72 A.D.3d 809, 898 N.Y.S.2d 479

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 13, 2010·Published

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), entered April 13, 2009, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

[810] Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant established, prima facie, its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), entered April 13, 2009, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

[810] Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant established, prima facie, its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Wild v. Temple Isaiah, 72 A.D.3d 809, 898 N.Y.S.2d 479 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

72 A.D.3d 809 (Wild v. Temple Isaiah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related