Wild v. State
This text of 320 S.W.3d 244 (Wild v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Tracy Wild (Appellant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment dismissing with prejudice her Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court did not clearly err in dismissing Appellant’s motion as untimely. Rule 24.035(b); Thomas v. State, 249 S.W.3d 234, 238 (Mo.App. E.D.2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment *245 pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 S.W.3d 244, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1266, 2010 WL 3637496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wild-v-state-moctapp-2010.