Wild v. Hyams
This text of 229 A.D. 792 (Wild v. Hyams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed for the plaintiffs for ninety-five dollars and fourteen cents, without costs of trial. Upon the undisputed and conceded figures appearing in the record, there was a balance of ninety-five dollars and fourteen cents due plaintiffs, and it was, therefore, error for the learned Special Term to dismiss the complaint. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent with this decision are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
229 A.D. 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wild-v-hyams-nyappdiv-1930.