Wild v. Bausch & Lome Inc.

250 A.D.2d 382, 672 N.Y.S.2d 687, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5284

This text of 250 A.D.2d 382 (Wild v. Bausch & Lome Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wild v. Bausch & Lome Inc., 250 A.D.2d 382, 672 N.Y.S.2d 687, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5284 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart Cohen, J.), entered on or about November 7, 1997, which order, inter alia, only conditionally [383]*383granted appellant’s motion for an order striking plaintiffs’ note of issue, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.

A 1998 order in this action striking plaintiffs’ case from the TAP calendar renders the appeal moot (see, e.g., Westinghouse Elec. Supply Co. v Pyramid Champlain Co., 193 AD2d 928, 932). Were the appeal not moot, we would find no improvident exercise of discretion. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Williams, Tom, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Pyramid Champlain Co.
193 A.D.2d 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
250 A.D.2d 382, 672 N.Y.S.2d 687, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wild-v-bausch-lome-inc-nyappdiv-1998.