Wilczinski v. Lick

Mississippi Supreme Court

Wilczinski v. Lick

68 Miss. 596

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1891·Published

Opinion

Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

“ It is not allowable by a subsequent agreement to convert the relation of vendor and vendee into that of landlord and tenant so [598]*598as to defeat supervening rights.” Nobles v. McCarty, 61 Miss. 456.

The evidence in this case shows that that was done, and the instruction for the plaintiff was properly given, and the verdict is supported by evidence.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

“ It is not allowable by a subsequent agreement to convert the relation of vendor and vendee into that of landlord and tenant so [598]*598as to defeat supervening rights.” Nobles v. McCarty, 61 Miss. 456.

The evidence in this case shows that that was done, and the instruction for the plaintiff was properly given, and the verdict is supported by evidence.

Affirmed.

Wilczinski v. Lick, 68 Miss. 596 (Mich. 1891).

Pincite

68 Miss. 596 (Wilczinski v. Lick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related