Wilczak v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
65 A.D.2d 960, 410 N.Y.S.2d 474, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13897
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 1978·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The court may always resettle its orders upon motion of a party, his attorney or sua sponte upon proper notice to all parties when the order does not accurately recite the decision of the court (see CPLR 5015; Matter of Samson, 60 AD2d 964; 2 Carmody-Wait 2d, NY Prac, § 8:125 et seq.). (Appeal from order of Oneida Supreme Court — disqualify attorneys.) Present — Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Dillon and Hancock, Jr., JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilczak v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 65 A.D.2d 960, 410 N.Y.S.2d 474, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).
65 A.D.2d 960 (Wilczak v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barakakos v. Avellini
185 A.D.2d 805 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)