Wilcoxson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wilcoxson v. State

898 So. 2d 278, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5251, 2005 WL 856982

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 15, 2005

DocketNo. 5D04-1699

StatusPublished

This text of 898 So. 2d 278 (Wilcoxson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilcoxson v. State, 898 So. 2d 278, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5251, 2005 WL 856982 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

MONACO, J.

The appellant, Latasha Wilcoxson, appeals the judgment and sentence meted out to her by the trial court after the court found that she had violated the terms of her probation. While a violation of probation hearing was conducted by the trial court, and while the court orally found that Ms. Wilcoxson had violated probation, the court failed to render a written order mak[279]*279ing the findings required to support a revocation of probation, and formally revoking her probation. See Patt v. State, 876 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Brinson v. State, 866 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Barta v. State, 678 So.2d 923 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Forget v. State, 675 So.2d 259 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). The State concedes error. Accordingly, we remand for entry of the required order, including findings of fact.

REVERSED and REMANDED for entry of a proper written order of adjudication.

PETERSON and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MONACO, J.

The appellant, Latasha Wilcoxson, appeals the judgment and sentence meted out to her by the trial court after the court found that she had violated the terms of her probation. While a violation of probation hearing was conducted by the trial court, and while the court orally found that Ms. Wilcoxson had violated probation, the court failed to render a written order mak[279]*279ing the findings required to support a revocation of probation, and formally revoking her probation. See Patt v. State, 876 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Brinson v. State, 866 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Barta v. State, 678 So.2d 923 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Forget v. State, 675 So.2d 259 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). The State concedes error. Accordingly, we remand for entry of the required order, including findings of fact.

REVERSED and REMANDED for entry of a proper written order of adjudication.

PETERSON and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

898 So. 2d 278, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5251, 2005 WL 856982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilcoxson-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack