Wilcox v. Waterman
113 Mass. 296
Opinion
The conversation between one of the grantors and Osborn, after the deed had been delivered to the grantee and the purchase money paid by him, are not admissible against him to show that Osborn had no authority to deliver the deed.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilcox v. Waterman, 113 Mass. 296 (Mass. 1873).
113 Mass. 296 (Wilcox v. Waterman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
England Bros. v. Miller
174 N.E. 483 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1931)
Rigsby v. Oil Well Supply Co.
91 S.W. 460 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1905)
Watson v. Kansas & Texas Coal Co.
52 Mo. App. 366 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1893)