Wilcox v. McKenzie

1 Ga. L. Rep. 235
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 1, 1885·Published

Opinion

Hall, J.

An action to recover damages for suing out and levying an attachment and for instituting proceedings to obtain, and serving summons of garnishment, cannot be maintained without proof of malice and want of probable cause, and in the absence of any such proof, a a nonsuit was properly awarded. Actions for criminal prosecution and civil suits require substantially the same essentials. 98 U. S., 192; 4 Barn. & Cres., 21; 2 Car. & P , 485 ; 19 Wend., 417; 2 Penn., 149; 4 Burrows, 1791; U. S. Digest, 1st Series, vol. 8, part 95, 942; 29 Ga., 64; 30 Id., 519; 63 Id., 683; 56 Id., 188; 13 Id., 260,262; 44 Id., 160, 161; Mitchell vs. Southwestern R. R. (present term). 1 Ga. Law Reporter, 70; Code, §§2982, 2983, 2987.

(a) This does not conflict with the case of Juchter vs. Boehm, Bendheim & Co., 67 Ga., 534.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilcox v. McKenzie, 1 Ga. L. Rep. 235 (Ga. 1885).

1 Ga. L. Rep. 235 (Wilcox v. McKenzie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burhans v. Sanford & Brown
19 Wend. 417 (New York Supreme Court, 1838)
Sledge v. McLaren
29 Ga. 64 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1859)
Juchter v. Boehm, Bendheim & Co.
67 Ga. 534 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1880)