Wilcox v. Howland

New York Supreme Court

Wilcox v. Howland

6 Cow. 576

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 15, 1827

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 Cow. 576 (Wilcox v. Howland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilcox v. Howland, 6 Cow. 576 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).

Pincite

Opinion

Curia.

The supplemental affidavit cannot be received. The excuse would have warranted a notice of the motion for a subsequent day in term, but not a short notice. Copies of all supplemental affidavits must be served the same length of time before the day for which the motion is noticed, as is necessary for the service of the copies of the principal affidavits. The defendant’s counsel may withdraw his papers and renew the motion at the next term.

Papers withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curia.

The supplemental affidavit cannot be received. The excuse would have warranted a notice of the motion for a subsequent day in term, but not a short notice. Copies of all supplemental affidavits must be served the same length of time before the day for which the motion is noticed, as is necessary for the service of the copies of the principal affidavits. The defendant’s counsel may withdraw his papers and renew the motion at the next term.

Papers withdrawn.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Cow. 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilcox-v-howland-nysupct-1827.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack