Wilcox v. Holmes
This text of 20 Wis. 307 (Wilcox v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tbe affidavit of tbe appellant contained tbe statements of an affidavit of merits, and also enough, taken in connection with tbe affidavit of Williams, to excuse bis neglect in not noticing tbe action for trial tbe first and second terms after tbe appeal. He ought, therefore, to have been permitted to file bis answer, and then tbe cause should have been continued on terms.
By the Court. — The judgment of tbe circuit court is reversed, and tbe cause remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 Wis. 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilcox-v-holmes-wis-1866.