Wilcox v. Holmes
20 Wis. 307
Opinion
Tbe affidavit of tbe appellant contained tbe statements of an affidavit of merits, and also enough, taken in connection with tbe affidavit of Williams, to excuse bis neglect in not noticing tbe action for trial tbe first and second terms after tbe appeal. He ought, therefore, to have been permitted to file bis answer, and then tbe cause should have been continued on terms.
By the Court. — The judgment of tbe circuit court is reversed, and tbe cause remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilcox v. Holmes, 20 Wis. 307 (Wis. 1866).
20 Wis. 307 (Wilcox v. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Equity Savings & Loan Co. v. Boisfontaine
40 So. 241 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1905)
Whitham v. Mappes
62 N.W. 430 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1895)
Holt v. Coleman
21 N.W. 297 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1884)
Pinger v. Vanclick
36 Wis. 141 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1874)