Wilcox v. Gillett
This text of 130 P. 692 (Wilcox v. Gillett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon the showing made the court is of the opinion that the order made by the district court did not amount to a disbarment or suspension of the attorney, or to a denial of his right to be heard upon a formal application for a change of venue or for the selection of a judge pro tem. to try his cases. It can not be known at this time when a judgment will be reached in the disbarment case, but it is evident that the interval will be so considerable that no proceedings in the district court should be held in abeyance to await the result in that matter.
The application for a writ of mandamus is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
130 P. 692, 88 Kan. 645, 1913 Kan. LEXIS 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilcox-v-gillett-kan-1913.