Wilcox v. Bundy

13 La. 380
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 15, 1839
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 La. 380 (Wilcox v. Bundy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilcox v. Bundy, 13 La. 380 (La. 1839).

Opinion

Eustis, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

On dissolving an injunction in this case, the judge condemned the plaintiff and his surety to pay twenty per cent, damages, ten per cent, interest, and fifty dollars counsel fees, which it was proved the defendant would be obliged to pay in consequence of the injunction obtained by the plaintiff.

The law of the 25th of March, 1831, provides, that in case the injunction be dissolved, the court, in the same judgment, shall condemn the plaintiff and surety jointly and severally, to pay to the defendant, interest at the rate of ten per cent, per annum, on the amount of the judgment, and not more r 7 jo? than twenty per cent, as damages, unless damages to a greater amount be proved. It does not appear that any proof was administered, except as to the counsel fees. If a greater sum than twenty per cent, was allowed, proof of damages to a sum exceeding that amount should have been made under the statute. The sum of fifty dollars, is, therefore, disallowed. The judgment is therefore reversed, so far as relates to that sum, and confirmed as to the residue : the [382]*382appellee to pay the costs of appeal, and the appellant those of the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farrar v. New Orleans Gas Light & Banking Co.
2 La. Ann. 873 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1847)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 La. 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilcox-v-bundy-la-1839.