Wilcombe v. Dodge

3 Cal. 260
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1853
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 3 Cal. 260 (Wilcombe v. Dodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilcombe v. Dodge, 3 Cal. 260 (Cal. 1853).

Opinion

Heydenfeldt, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court. Murray, Chief Justice, concurred.

It is contended that suit may be brought on a promissory note on the day it becomes due, and several authorities have been cited which have so determined. We prefer adhering to the reasonable rule, which has been long established, that the payee has all of the day on which the note falls due, in which to pay it, and therefore that a suit commenced on that day is premature. The cases which decide otherwise subvert the general principle of law, for the seeming purpose of remedying particular cases of hardship.

We are satisfied that a departure from a reasonable and well-settled doctrine, is productive of too much harm in the future to authorize us to adopt it, howsoever much it may be merited in a given case.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farmers' National Bank v. Salina Paper Manufacturing Co.
48 P. 863 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1897)
Sabin v. Burke
37 P. 357 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1894)
Home National Bank v. Newton
8 Ill. App. 563 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1881)
Holland v. Clark
32 Ark. 697 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1878)
Davis v. Eppinger
18 Cal. 378 (California Supreme Court, 1861)
McFarland v. Pico
8 Cal. 626 (California Supreme Court, 1857)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Cal. 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilcombe-v-dodge-cal-1853.