Wilcock v. Heermance
53 N.Y.S. 1118
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 21, 1898
StatusPublished
This text of 53 N.Y.S. 1118 (Wilcock v. Heermance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wilcock v. Heermance, 53 N.Y.S. 1118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).
Opinion
No opinion. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of Haupt v. Ames, 26 App. Div. 550, 50 N. Y. Supp. 495, and Schaefer v. Lithographing Co. (Sup.) 51 N. Y. Supp. 104.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Haupt v. Ames
26 A.D. 550 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
Schaefer v. Empire Lithographing Co.
28 A.D. 469 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
53 N.Y.S. 1118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilcock-v-heermance-nyappdiv-1898.