Wilco Products, Inc. v. Alumatic Corp. of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wilco Products, Inc. v. Alumatic Corp. of America

281 A.D. 912, 120 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3753

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 30, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 281 A.D. 912 (Wilco Products, Inc. v. Alumatic Corp. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilco Products, Inc. v. Alumatic Corp. of America, 281 A.D. 912, 120 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant, a foreign corporation, appearing specially, moved to vacate and set aside a summons and to dismiss the action, on the ground that it is not doing business in this State sufficient to render it amenable to suit. The Special Term made an order referring the motion to an Official Referee to hear and determine and another order denying defendant’s motion for reargument. Defendant appeals from both orders. Order referring motion to an Official Referee to hear and determine affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Order denying motion for reargument dismissed, without costs. Such an order is not appealable. Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel, Mac-Crate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant, a foreign corporation, appearing specially, moved to vacate and set aside a summons and to dismiss the action, on the ground that it is not doing business in this State sufficient to render it amenable to suit. The Special Term made an order referring the motion to an Official Referee to hear and determine and another order denying defendant’s motion for reargument. Defendant appeals from both orders. Order referring motion to an Official Referee to hear and determine affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Order denying motion for reargument dismissed, without costs. Such an order is not appealable. Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel, Mac-Crate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D. 912, 120 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilco-products-inc-v-alumatic-corp-of-america-nyappdiv-1953.